The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether adoption of DaVinci Xi
The Pubmed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases were systematically searched. Operating time as well as docking and surgeon console times were the primary endpoints. Conversion and postoperative complication rates were the secondary endpoints.
Six studies totaling 610 patients (320 Si and 290 Xi) were included. Total operating time [MD (95% CI) = 30.553 (15.071, 46.035); p < 0.001], docking time [MD (95% CI) = 4.178 (2.120, 6.235); p < 0.001] and surgeon console time [MD (95% CI) = 17.246 (-0.479, 34.971); p = 0.056] were longer in DaVinci Si
This meta-analysis found that the adoption of DaVinci Xi

A meta-analysis of DaVinci Si versus Xi in colorectal surgery.

Reply to Hertenstein et al. 's commentary on Yue et al.: Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments for insomnia in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Papers