This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects if probiotics can inhibit oral carcinogenesis.
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PLOS databases were searched up to February 2020 to identify randomised controlled trials that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment of articles. This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA-P) 2015 protocol guidelines.
The initial search retrieved 774 articles. Of these, only five articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. Two out of the five papers were further analysed for quantitative synthesis in meta-analysis. The majority of the included studies were found to be of "moderate quality". The qualitative synthesis found four probiotics that exhibited potential therapeutic effects in oral carcinogenesis, includingAcetobacter syzygii, AJ2, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Lactobacillus salivarius REN. Among them, the application of L. salivarius REN resulted in a 95 % lower risk for developing oral cancer (p < 0.05).
It is known that probiotics have the potential to inhibit oral carcinogenesis, thus supporting the hypothesis of the study. The ability of L. salivarius REN to inhibit the development of oral cancer suggested that this bacterium can be a potential inhibitory agent against oral carcinogenesis.

Probiotic inhibits oral carcinogenesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To assess the effectiveness and safety of Zao Ren An Shen (ZRAS), a Chinese herbal medicine formula, for the treatment of insomnia.
Seven databases (ie, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane library, and PsycINFO, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and Chongqing VIP) were searched from their inception to 6 November 2018. Controlled trials comparing the effectiveness or safety of ZRAS to conventional treatments, a placebo or no-treatment in an insomnia population were selected. Primary outcomes were: sleep quality (assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI), and the number of adverse events at post-treatment. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3.
A total of 19 studies (1780 participants) were included. The effect of ZRAS on sleep quality (mean difference) was found to be superior compared to placebo in the sole placebo-controlled study located [-0.90 (-1.56, -0.24; 95% CI), p = 0.007] and similar to Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonists (BzRAs) [0.17 (-0.29, 0.64); 95% CI, p = 0.46]. The number of adverse events (relative risk) was lower for ZRAS than BzRAs [0.16 (0.12, 0.23; 95% CI), p < 0.001]. An overall high risk of bias was found in the selected studies.
The results favor ZRAS against BzRAs and placebo for the treatment of insomnia. However, the poor methodology of the studies prevents strong recommendations for ZRAS. Clinical trials with higher quality designs are required.

Papers