PICO

3 results

Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pötsch N, Vatteroni G, Clauser P, Helbich TH, Baltzer PAT - Radiology, September 27, 2022 53 citations

breast cancer, CEM, CE-MRI

I/C

contrast-enhanced mammography, contrast-enhanced MRI, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value

diagnostic performance

Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hadadi I, Rae W, Clarke J, McEntee M, Ekpo E - Clinical breast cancer, April 14, 2021 25 citations

women with non-dense and dense breasts

I/C

mammography (MG) alone versus MG combined with adjunctive imaging modalities, including handheld ultrasound (HHUS), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MG alone versus MG combined with adjunctive imaging modalities

diagnostic performance, cancer detection rates (CDRs), recall rate

Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.

Lobig F, Caleyachetty A, Forrester L, Morris E, Newstead G, Harris J, Blankenburg M - Clinical breast cancer, May 19, 2023 2 citations

women with dense breasts

I/C

supplemental imaging modalities, breast cancer risk

cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate

Papers