We acknowledge that between endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, with some evidence of benefits observed in clinical trials. However, there remains a significant gap in the evidence regarding the real-world application and effectiveness of EVT.The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy differences between EVT and standard medical treatment (SMT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion(BAO).
Real-world studies (RWSs) on patients with BAO who underwent EVT and SMT were identified through searches in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy outcomes included good clinical outcomes [defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 90 days], excellence clinical outcomes (defined as mRS scores of 0-2 at 90 days), 90-day mortality rate, and reperfusion status. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study type (prospective and retrospective studies). The relationship between EVT and SMT with the prognosis of BAO patients was expressed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
The seven studies involved a total of 2885 patients. After conducting sensitivity analysis and excluding articles with high heterogeneity, EVT demonstrated a significant association with good clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=4.01, 95% CI: 2.60-6.19) and excellence clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=5.70, 95% CI: 3.18-10.22) compared to SMT. Additionally, EVT showed a lower correlation with 90-day mortality rate compared to the SMT group (OR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.25-0.47). Subgroup analysis based on study type revealed that EVT had higher rates of successful reperfusion (retrospective study group: OR=7.97, 95% CI: 4.83-13.15; prospective study group: OR=51.57, 95% CI: 29.76-89.38) than the SMT group in both subgroups. The presence of sICH was not statistically significant in the retrospective study group (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.58-2.48) and showed high heterogeneity. However, in the prospective study group, EVT exhibited a higher risk of bleeding compared to SMT (OR=11.42, 95% CI: 2.65-49.20).
In summary, our real-world study aligns with the conclusions of recently published randomized controlled trials research. When comparing EVT and SMT in the treatment of BAO, EVT shows a higher correlation with favorable clinical outcomes, higher rates of successful reperfusion, and lower mortality rates. However, it does come with an increased risk of sICH.

Real-world safety and efficacy endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The best management for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) has increasingly been clarified by recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing endovascular therapy (EVT) vs best medical management (BMM).
We searched PubMed, Embase, the CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2000, to November 20, 2022. We included RCTs comparing EVT vs BMM in BAO or bilateral vertebral artery occlusion (VAO). Primary outcome was ambulation (modified Rankin Scale score [mRS] 0-3) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, death by 90 days, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI was used as a measure of the association of EVT vs BMM with outcomes.
Final analyses included 4 RCTs with 988 patients with BAO or VAO. Pooled results showed that EVT vs BMM was associated with an increased rate of 90-day ambulation (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.05), independence (RR 1.83, 1.08-3.08) and a reduced risk of mortality (RR 0.76, 0.65-0.89), but an increased risk of sICH (RR 7.48, 2.27-24.62) and the benefits might be confined to patients with BAO but not patients with VAO. EVT effect was modified by occlusion location with the basilar artery, with greatest benefit for proximal, intermediate benefit for middle, and least benefit for distal occlusions.
EVT compared with BMM might be associated with an increased rate of ambulation, independence and survival but with an increased risk of sICH in patients with acute BAO.

Efficacy of endovascular therapy for basilar and vertebral artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Analysis of rare binary events is an important problem for biomedical researchers. Due to the sparsity of events in such problems, meta-analysis that integrates information across multiple studies can be applied to increase the efficiency of statistical inference. Although it is critical to examine whether the effect sizes are homogeneous across all studies, a comprehensive review of homogeneity tests has been lacking, and in particular, no attention has been paid to infrequent dichotomous outcomes. We systematically review statistical methods for homogeneity testing. By conducting an extensive simulation analysis and two case studies, we examine the performance of 30 tests in meta-analysis of rare binary outcomes. When using log-odds ratio as the association measure, our simulation results suggest that there is no uniform winner. However, we recommend the test proposed by Kulinskaya and Dollinger (BMC Med Res Methodol, 2015, 15), which uses a gamma distribution to approximate the null distribution, for its generally good performance; for very rare events coupled with small within-study sample sizes, in addition to the Kulinskaya-Dollinger test, we further recommend the conditional score test based on the random-effects hypergeometric model proposed by Liang and Self (Biometrika, 1985, 72:353-358). One should be cautious about the use of the Wald tests, the Lipsitz tests (Biometrics, 1998, 54:148-160), and tests proposed by Bhaumik et al (J Am Stat Assoc, 2012, 107:555-567).

A comparison of hypothesis tests for homogeneity in meta-analysis with focus on rare binary events.

There is no randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with posterior circulation occlusion (PCO). Hence, we firstly performed a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of MT in PCO and then compared these outcomes to anterior circulation occlusion (ACO) to provide fundamental data to further studies.
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from dates of inception to June 2019 for relevant studies. Outcomes including functional independence at 90 days, successful recanalization, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and futile recanalization were extracted.
Seven studies involving 474 patients with PCO thrombectomy were analyzed. There was a lower rate of functional independence at 90 days and a higher rate of mortality after thrombectomy in PCO versus ACO (odds ratios (OR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.90; OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.30-3.18). Recanalization rates were comparable (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.62-1.65), but a higher futile recanalization rate was found in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.30-2.37). There was a lower rate of sICH in MT for patients with PCO versus ACO (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.29-0.99).
We found that the outcomes of MT for patients with PCO were poorer than with ACO. On the other hand, MT appears to have lower rates of sICH and to increase successful recanalization. Given the high recanalization rate, MT may serve as an adjunct to standard treatment. The key point to improve outcomes is recognizing reliable factors associated with futile recanalization and optimizing the results of MT. But in view of the different characteristics of posterior circulation stroke and anterior circulation stroke, the results are far from robust.

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Posterior Circulation Occlusion: A Comparison of Outcomes with the Anterior Circulation Occlusion - A Meta-Analysis.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disease characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort associated with altered bowel habits. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of acupuncture and moxibustion for IBS. Many systematic reviews of acupuncture and moxibustion for IBS have been published in recent years, but their results are not entirely consistent.
To evaluate the methodological, reporting, and evidence quality of systematic reviews of acupuncture and moxibustion for IBS.
Systematic reviews of acupuncture and moxibustion for IBS published before February 20, 2023 were searched in eight databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and China Biology Medicine. The keywords used for literature search were acupuncture, moxibustion, systematic review, meta-analysis, and irritable bowel syndrome.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture and moxibustion for IBS were included.
Relevant information was independently extracted by two investigators. The A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to evaluate the methodological quality, reporting quality and evidence quality, respectively.
A total of 342 studies were retrieved and 15 systematic reviews were included. The results of AMSTAR 2 showed low methodological quality in 2 studies and very low methodological quality in the remaining 13 studies, with main issues being failure to register a protocol, incomplete search strategy, not providing a list of excluded studies, incomplete consideration of the risk of bias in the included studies, and a failure to assess the publication bias. The results of PRISMA 2020 showed seriously deficient reporting quality of 2 studies, somewhat deficient reporting quality of 12 studies, and relatively complete reporting quality of 1 study, with the main problems being lack of a complete search strategy, non-availability of a list of excluded studies with justification for their exclusion, not conducting heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses, not evaluating the credibility of the evidence, and not registering the protocol. The results of GRADE showed that the quality of the evidence is low or very low.
Most included systematic reviews interpreted findings to suggest that acupuncture and moxibustion have benefits for IBS. However, there is a need to improve the methodological, reporting and evidence quality of the systematic reviews. Larger, multicenter, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials and high-quality systematic reviews are required to obtain more robust evidence.
Ma YY, Hao Z, Chen ZY, Shen YX, Liu HR, Wu HG, Bao CH. Acupuncture and moxibustion for irritable bowel syndrome: An umbrella systematic review. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(1): 22-31.

Acupuncture and moxibustion for irritable bowel syndrome: An umbrella systematic review.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread worldwide. Integrated Chinese and Western medicine have had some successes in treating COVID-19.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas (3-drugs-3-formulas) in patients with COVID-19.
Relevant studies were identified from 12 electronic databases searched from their establishment to April 7, 2022.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and cohort studies that evaluated the effects of 3-drugs-3-formulas for COVID-19. The treatment group was treated with one of the 3-drugs-3-formulas plus conventional treatment. The control group was treated with conventional treatment.
Two evaluators screened and selected literature independently, then extracted basic information and assessed risk of bias. The treatment outcome measures were duration of main symptoms, hospitalization time, aggravation rate and mortality. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyze the pooled results reported as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data.
Forty-one studies with a total of 13,260 participants were identified. Our analysis suggests that compared with conventional treatment, the combination of 3-drugs-3-formulas might shorten duration of fever (MD = -1.39; 95% CI: -2.19 to -0.59; P < 0.05), cough (MD = -1.57; 95% CI: -2.16 to -0.98; P < 0.05) and fatigue (MD = -1.36; 95% CI: -2.21 to -0.51; P < 0.05), decrease length of hospital stay (MD = -2.62; 95% CI -3.52 to -1.72; P < 0.05), the time for nucleic acid conversion (MD = -2.92; 95% CI: -4.26 to -1.59; P < 0.05), aggravation rate (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.64; P < 0.05) and mortality (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.62; P < 0.05), and increase the recovery rate of chest computerized tomography manifestations (RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.3; P < 0.05) and total effectiveness (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.42; P < 0.05).
The 3-drugs-3-formulas can play an active role in treating all stages of COVID-19. No severe adverse events related to 3-drugs-3-formulas were observed. Hence, 3-drugs-3-formulas combined with conventional therapies have effective therapeutic value for COVID-19 patients. Further long-term high-quality studies are essential to demonstrate the clinical benefits of each formula. Please cite this article as: You LZ, Dai QQ, Zhong XY, Yu DD, Cui HR, Kong YF, Zhao MZ, Zhang XY, Xu QQ, Guan ZY, Wei XX, Zhang XC, Han SJ, Liu WJ, Chen Z, Zhang XY, Zhao C, Jin YH, Shang HC. Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population. J Integr Med. 2023; 21(5): 441-454.

Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population.

Papers