Drug-Coated Balloons versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with In-Stent Restenosis: A Pair-Wise Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Published
May 16, 2020
Journal
Cardiovascular therapeutics
PICOID
ffec9b2e
DOI
Citations
8
Keywords
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Nina Peng et al.
Patients/Population/Participants

patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR)

Intervention

drug-coated balloons (DCB)

Comparison

everolimus-eluting stents (EES)

Outcome

minimum lumen diameter, angiographic results, clinical events

Abstract

P
I
C
O

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloons (DCB) with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and the differential relative effect of DCB in patients with drug-eluting stents (DES)-ISR and bare metal stents (BMS)-ISR. The efficiency and safety of DCB and EES need to be assessed for the treatment of ISR. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE to identify all relevant studies. Angiographic results and clinical events were separately assessed. Subgroup meta-analyses were performed according to the type of restenosed stent. Six randomized trials with 1134 patients were included. The overall pooled outcomes indicated that DCB was associated with lower minimum lumen diameter (mean difference ( DCB was inferior to EES in DES-ISR and comparable in BMS-ISR in terms of angiographic results and clinical events.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.