Clinical Outcomes of Open Versus Arthroscopic Broström Procedure for Lateral Ankle Instability: A Meta-analysis.

Abstract

Arthroscopic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament is becoming increasingly popular as a surgical option for lateral ankle instability. However, studies directly comparing outcomes of open and arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair continue to present conflicting conclusions. This review aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and open Broström procedure. A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from January 2010 to March 2020 to identify all clinical studies (level of evidence I-III) comparing outcomes of arthroscopic versus open Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Six studies were included in this review. The arthroscopic technique, compared to the open technique, resulted in higher American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-2.34, p= .04), higher Karlsson scores (WMD = 1.86, 95% CI: 0.46-3.25, p= .009) and lower Visual Analog Scale pain scores (WMD = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.10, p= .003). There were no differences between the groups in terms of postoperative anterior drawer test (WMD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.60 to 0.39, p= .68), talar tilt (WMD = 0.31, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.72, p= .14) or overall complication rates (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.37-1.64, p= .51). The odds of wound-related complications in arthroscopic Broström procedures was significantly lower than that of open Broström procedures (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.95, p= .04). Current evidence shows that arthroscopic repairs offer comparable clinical outcomes with a lower wound complication rate, compared to traditional open repairs.

Similar article map