[Accuracy of Xpert

Abstract

To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert Four Chinese databases (SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) and three English databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched from January 1, 2000 to September 15, 2017, to identify diagnostic tests about the accuracy of Xpert A total of 47 articles were included in this systematic review. Most of them (38 articles) were in Chinese and only 9 articles were in English. All the articles were published during 2014 to 2017, and the sample size ranged from 31 to 3 151. Forty articles including 42 comparisons about TB were finally included with the pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% Xpert 系统评价结核分枝杆菌/利福平耐药实时荧光定量核酸扩增检测方法(Xpert 计算机检索SinoMed、CNKI、万方、维普、PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library数据库，搜集于中国人群中应用Xpert 最终共纳入47篇文献，其中英文9篇，中文38篇，发表时间为2014—2017年，样本量范围为31~3 151例，活动性肺结核共纳入40篇文献(42个比较组)，合并灵敏度为0.94(95% 使用Xpert

Similar article map