The efficacy and safety comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody, chemotherapy and supportive treatment for pretreated advanced esophagogastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.
patients with pretreated advanced esophagogastric cancer
PD-(L)1 antibody, chemotherapy, supportive treatment
supportive treatment, PD-(L)1 antibody, chemotherapy
overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), all grades and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)
Abstract
Immunotherapy is important for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-(L)1 antibody, chemotherapy, and supportive treatment in the management of pretreated advanced esophagogastric cancer. The randomized controlled trials were identified by searching electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase database. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out using software R 3.3.2. Main outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), all grades and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted and analyzed. The ranking results for all outcomes were performed to identify the best treatments. Seven high-quality RCTs involving 1,891 patients were taken into analysis. Compared with supportive treatment, PD-(L)1 antibody and chemotherapy both had a significantly longer OS time. Chemotherapy could obvious improve PFS than supportive treatment, but it had more all grades and serious TRAEs than PD-(L)1 antibody and supportive treatment. No significant difference was found in other comparisons. The probabilities of rank plot showed that PD-(L)1 antibody was the best in the outcome of OS. Chemotherapy ranked first in PFS and ranked last in all grades and serious TRAEs. According to our results, PD-(L)1 antibody had excellent survival benefits and tolerable TRAEs for pretreated advanced esophagogastric cancer. It might be a suitable potential choice, especially for patients with high PDL1 CPS or with gastroesophageal junction cancer.