Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.

Published
December 28, 2022
Journal
Pediatric surgery international
PICOID
b38cbfc3
DOI
Citations
0
Keywords
Antibiotic prophylaxis, Meta-analysis, Pediatric surgery, Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Patients/Population/Participants

pediatric patients

Intervention

Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP)

Comparison

no Intervention (NI)

Outcome

systemic infection

Abstract

P
I
C
O

To investigate if Antibiotic Prophylaxis (AP) can prevent wound and/or systemic infection in pediatric patients who underwent Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and Observational Studies that compared AP vs. no Intervention (NI) in children submitted to PEG. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with random-effect models. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed as outlined by Cochrane recommendations. Four studies, including one RCT, with a total of 568 patients were included, in which 230 (40.5%) individuals received AP. The use of AP during PEG reduced the incidence of systemic infection (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p = 0.02; I In this pooled analysis of 568 infants who underwent PEG, the use of AP reduced the incidence of systemic infection. Our results were compatible with findings obtained in the adult population. No differences were found regarding wound infection or the composite outcome of any kind of infection.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.