Strategies of left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO support: a network meta-analysis.

Published
February 15, 2020
Journal
International journal of cardiology
PICOID
b05426ba
DOI
Citations
49
Keywords
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Patients/Population/Participants

patients undergoing VA-ECMO

Intervention

mechanical LV unloading

Comparison

afterload reduction (IABP) vs. preload reduction (Impella pump, right upper pulmonary/trans-septal catheters, LV surgical vents)

Outcome

in-hospital death

Abstract

P
I
C
O

Left ventricle (LV) unloading during VenoArterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) reduces the risk of LV distention, stagnation and pulmonary congestion resulting from the increased afterload. Lacking direct comparisons between unloading strategies we used network meta-analysis to indirectly compare different unloading approaches. A literature research was performed to include all studies on VA-ECMO reporting data on mechanical LV unloading. The pre-specified outcome was in-hospital death. Literature search identified 389 studies: 16 were included in the analysis (3930 patients). Two strategies of mechanical LV unloading were compared: afterload reduction (IABP) and preload reduction (Impella pump, right upper pulmonary/trans-septal catheters, LV surgical vents). Any LV unloading strategy was associated with mortality reduction with overall OR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.42-0.70; p < .001. Targeting afterload was associated with reduced mortality (OR = 0.61 95% CI 0.46-0.81; p < .001; I Any unloading strategy in VA-ECMO patients was associated with lower mortality as compared to no-unloading. Preload reduction strategies resulted superior to afterload reduction.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.