[Comparison of endoscopic versus conventional surgery for benign parotid tumor: a metaanalysis].

Abstract

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic versus conventional surgery for benign parotid tumor. We searched the electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang Data for studies published before January, 2021. A meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.3 software. We retrieved 8 eligible studies involving a total of 532 patients, and 4 of the studies were RCT. The results of meta-analysis showed that endoscopic surgery was better than conventional surgery in terms of incision length (WMD=- 5.73; 95% 通过比较腔镜手术与传统手术在治疗腮腺良性肿瘤效果的系统评价，比较两种手术方式的效果。 检索CNKI、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、万方医学网等数据库在2021年1月以前发表的所有文章。对文章进行筛选及提取，使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行meta分析。 纳入8篇文章，4篇RCT研究，共532名患者，meta分析结果显示，在切口长度[加权平均差(WMD)=-5.73;95% 腔镜下良性腮腺肿瘤切除在切口长度、术中预估出血量、术后引流量、切口满意度、短暂性面瘫方面优于传统组，但是在手术时间、唾液腺、Frey综合征以及肿瘤复发，两组手术差异不明显。因此腔镜下腮腺良性肿瘤切除优于传统手术，是一种安全的手术方式。

Similar article map