Comparison of the outcomes of testicular torsion among children presenting during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic versus the pre-pandemic period: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
children with testicular torsion
presentation during the COVID-19 period
presentation during the pre-COVID-19 period
duration of symptoms, proportion of children with delayed presentation, orchiectomy rate
Abstract
To evaluate whether the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a prolonged duration of symptoms, a delayed presentation to the medical facility, and consequently more orchiectomy procedures among children with testicular torsion compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. Systematic search of four scientific databases was performed. The search terms used were (coronavirus OR novel coronavirus OR SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19) AND (testicular torsion OR orchidectomy OR orchiectomy OR orchidopexy OR orchiopexy). The inclusion criteria were all boys presenting with testicular torsion during the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 periods. A comparison of the average duration of symptoms, the proportion of children with delayed presentation (>24 h), and the proportion of children requiring orchiectomy was made among the two groups. The Downs and Black scale was used for methodological quality assessment. The present meta-analysis included six comparative studies (five retrospective studies). A total of 711 patients (473 during the COVID-19 period) were included. No significant differences in the average duration of symptoms (WMD: 2.6, 95% CI -6.78 to 11.99, P = 0.59), the proportion of children with delayed presentation (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.52-2.02, p = 0.94), and orchiectomy rate (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.82-1.84, p = 0.31) were observed among the two patient groups. All studies had a moderate risk of bias. The duration of symptoms, the proportion of children with delayed presentation, and orchiectomy rate did not significantly differ among the children with testicular torsion presenting during the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 periods. However, due to the moderate risk of bias, the level of evidence of the available comparative studies is limited.
