Accuracy of infrared thermography evaluation in burn wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Published
April 08, 2024
Journal
Journal of wound care
PICOID
87d6ec8a
DOI
Citations
0
Keywords
burns healing, frostbite, infrared thermography, postburn, temperature mappings, thermal injury, wound, wound care, wound dressing, wound healing
Copyright
Patients/Population/Participants

burn wound

Intervention

infrared thermography (IRT)

Comparison

other methods

Outcome

accuracy of IRT

Abstract

P
I
C
O

Accurate assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential is essential to determine early treatments. Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive and objective tool to do this. This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of IRT to determine burn wound healing potential. This systematic review and meta-analysis used MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, DiTA and CENTRAL databases. IRT data were extracted from primary studies and categorised into four cells (i.e., true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives). Subgroup analysis was performed according to methods used to capture thermal images. The search strategy identified 2727 publications; however, 15 articles were selected for review and 11 for meta-analysis. In our meta-analysis, the accuracy of IRT was 84.8% (63% sensitivity and 81.9% specificity). IRT is a moderately accurate tool to identify burn depth and healing potential. Thus, IRT should be used carefully for evaluating burn wounds.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.