Efficacy of different doses of dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
patients with idiopathic macular hole (IMH)
chromovitrectomy dye-assisted ILM peeling
ILM peeling without dye, 0.25% indocyanine green (ICG), 0.5% ICG, 0.05% brilliant blue G (BBG), 0.15% trypan blue (TB), 0.5% triamcinolone acetonide (TA)
IMH closure rate
Abstract
Pars plana vitrectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole. Several chromovitrectomy dyes have been used to improve the visualization of the internal limiting membrane (ILM), including indocyanine green, trypan blue (TB), brilliant blue G (BBG), and triamcinolone acetonide (TA). We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to establish the optimum concentration of chromovitrectomy dye-assisted ILM peeling for IMH. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies before January 2020. We performed a random-effects NMA using STATA version 15.1 to assess mean difference and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We identified twelve retrospective trails and five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comprising 1 492 patients of IMH on stage II-IV for ILM peeling. The results of IMH closure rate show that the effect of ILM peeling without dye was better than 0.25% ICG, the effects of ILM peeling with 0.5% ICG or TA were better than without dye, and the effects of ILM peeling with 0.05% BBG, 0.15% TB, 0.5% ICG or 0.05% ICG were better than 0.25% ICG. Ranking probability analysis shows that the rates of IMH closure after ILM peeling with 0.15% TB or 0.05% BBG were better than nine other concentrations of chromovitrectomy dyes. The 0.15% TB and 0.05% BBG were recommended as the better efficient treatment-assisted ILM peeling for IMH closure. For retina specialists who prefer to use ICG to assist ILM peeling, 0.05% ICG may be a good choice. However, high-quality large-scale RCTs are recommended to confirm the NMA results.