Physio-metabolic and clinical consequences of wearing face masks-Systematic review with meta-analysis and comprehensive evaluation.

Published
April 24, 2023
Journal
Frontiers in public health
PICOID
52362684
DOI
Citations
5
Keywords
MIES syndrome, adverse (side) effects, health risk assessment, long-term adverse effects, mask, masks and N95 respirators, risk-benefit, surgical mask
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Kisielinski, Hirsch, Wagner, Wojtasik, Funken, Klosterhalfen, Kanti Manna, Prescher, Sukul and Sönnichsen.
Patients/Population/Participants

medical surgical masks, N95 masks

Intervention

wearing face masks

Comparison

no face masks

Outcome

decreased SpO2, face mask side-effects

Abstract

P
I
C
O

As face masks became mandatory in most countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, adverse effects require substantiated investigation. A systematic review of 2,168 studies on adverse medical mask effects yielded 54 publications for synthesis and 37 studies for meta-analysis (on We found significant effects in both medical surgical and N95 masks, with a greater impact of the second. These effects included decreased SpO Masks interfered with O Face mask side-effects must be assessed (risk-benefit) against the available evidence of their effectiveness against viral transmissions. In the absence of strong empirical evidence of effectiveness, mask wearing should not be mandated let alone enforced by law. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021256694, identifier: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021256694.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.