Overall Survival After Systemic Treatment in High-volume Versus Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Published
April 16, 2021
Journal
European urology focus
PICOID
4a4095b3
DOI
Citations
34
Keywords
Abiraterone, Androgen deprivation therapy, Apalutamide, Docetaxel, Enzalutamide, High volume, Low volume, Metastatic burden
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Patients/Population/Participants

abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, docetaxel

Intervention

combination therapy, hormonal treatments, chemotherapy

Comparison

abiraterone vs. docetaxel, enzalutamide vs. docetaxel

Outcome

overall survival (OS), median OS duration

Abstract

P
I
C
O

Novel prospective randomized controlled observations addressing combination therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have demonstrated promising overall survival (OS) outcomes. To compare these novel findings and systematically review and address them within formal network meta-analyses (NMAs) that include observations from other prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). First, we focused on abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, and docetaxel effects on OS in mHSPC using the PRISMA methodology. PubMed and abstracts identified prospective RCTs in first-line mHSPC. Second, we focused on mature studies that reached median OS and tested OS between abiraterone and docetaxel with tumor burden stratification. The first part included seven studies (n = 6639) and the second part, five studies (n = 4462). In the first part, abiraterone ranked first for high-volume mHSPC. Conversely, enzalutamide ranked first for low-volume mHSPC. In the second part, abiraterone treatment in high-volume mHSPC resulted in median OS of 50.1 mo and exceeded that with docetaxel (45.9 mo) and ADT alone (34.0 mo). Docetaxel treatment in low volume mHSPC resulted in median OS of 69.5 mo versus 67.7 mo with ADT alone. In conventional NMA that relied on conventional hazard ratios, differences were identified with respect to the relative efficacy of the combination therapies examined; abiraterone dominated the alternatives in high-volume mHSPC. In part two, which relied on trials for which median OS is available, comparison of abiraterone versus docetaxel revealed a 4-mo difference in OS in high-volume mHSPC. Conventional NMA may have overestimated the importance of treatment efficacy instead of focusing on median OS duration, which might represent a more important clinical endpoint. We reviewed studies on hormonal treatments and chemotherapy used for prostate cancer that has spread outside the prostate gland (metastatic prostate cancer, mPC). We found that the best overall survival was with the hormone agents abiraterone in high-volume mPC and enzalutamide in low-volume mPC. In comparison to the chemotherapy drug docetaxel, median overall survival with abiraterone was 4 months longer among patients with mPC.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.