ASSOCIATION OF PULP CALCIFICATIONS AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
CVD patients, non-CVD patients
pulp calcifications (PC)
presence of PC in CVD patients vs. non-CVD patients
association between CVD and PC, risk of bias
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between pulp calcifications (PC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and ProQuest) were searched to identify articles. Quality assessment of the selected articles was done using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool and the inter-examiner agreement was calculated using the Cohen-Kappa test. The random-effects maximum likelihood model was used to evaluate the association between the conditions. Trim-and-fill funnel plot was used to evaluate the presence of publication bias. The level of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. A total of 2487 articles were identified from the initial search. Ten articles were included in this review of which 7 were cross-sectional and 3 were case-control studies. Eight articles had a low risk of bias (RoB), one article each had a moderate and high RoB. Inter-examiner reliability score was 0.8592. Seven articles reported a statistically significant positive association between CVD patients and PC. Two articles reported a non-significant positive association and one article reported no association between the same. A significant difference was observed in favor of CVD patients to possess more PC in comparison to non-CVD patients with an OR of 4.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.19, 8.46; p = .000). Asymmetry in the Trim-and-fill funnel Plot suggested the presence of publication bias. GRADE analysis demonstrated low certainty of the evidence for the overall sample. There exists a low level of evidence to show that CVD patients are more prone to have PC in comparison to non-CVD patients.