Modified Atkins diet versus ketogenic diet in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Published
October 03, 2022
Journal
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
PICOID
3915b6f1
DOI
Citations
11
Keywords
Drug resistant epilepsy, Efficacy, Ketogenic diet, Modified atkins diet, Refractory epilepsy
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Patients/Population/Participants

pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy

Intervention

modified Atkins diet (MAD) and traditional ketogenic diet (KD)

Comparison

traditional KD

Outcome

seizure frequency reduction (SFR) > 50%

Abstract

P
I
C
O

The modified Atkins diet (MAD), a less restrictive form of the ketogenic diet (KD), has gained popularity and is proposed to be an alternative to the traditional KD in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, the evidence to support this hypothesis remains limited. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MAD compared to traditional KD in children with DRE. We systematically searched multiple databases through March 2022 for all the studies that evaluated the clinical utility of MAD versus KD for DRE in a pediatric population. The primary outcome was the proportion of children who had seizure frequency reduction (SFR) > 50%. The secondary outcomes were SFR >90%, seizure freedom, and diet-related side effects. All measurements were taken 6 months after starting the regimens. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and combined using random-effects model meta-analysis. Six studies, with 397 patients with DRE (201 followed MAD vs. 196 with KD), were included. There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients who attained SFR >50% favoring the traditional KD (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.83; P = 0.001). However, there was no significant differences in SFR >90% (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.10; P = 0.13) or the proportion of patients who had seizure freedom (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.49-1.41; P = 0.49). Furthermore, both regimens had comparable safety profiles (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.95-1.05; P = 0.96). Our meta-analysis demonstrated the superiority of traditional KD over MAD in achieving SFR > 50% at 6 months in pediatric patients with DRE. However, SFR > 90% and seizure freedom were comparable between KD and MAD at 6 months. The tolerability profile between the two regimens was similar as well. Large-scale RCTs are necessary to validate our findings.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.