The motherhood wage penalty: A meta-analysis.

Published
May 30, 2020
Journal
Social science research
PICOID
2113e7d6
DOI
Citations
52
Keywords
Family wage gap, Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, Motherhood, Motherhood penalty
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Patients/Population/Participants

mothers, childless women

Intervention

meta-analysis

Comparison

mothers vs. childless women

Outcome

wage gap

Abstract

P
I
C
O

Mothers tend to receive lower wages than comparable childless women. This 'motherhood wage gap' has been reported in numerous studies. We summarize the existing empirical evidence on this topic using meta-analysis and test for several mechanisms which can be responsible for the persistence of the wage gap. Based on 208 wage effects of having exactly one child and 245 wage effects of the total number of children, we find an average motherhood wage gap of around 3.6-3.8%. While the gaps associated with the total number of children are mostly explained by the loss of mothers' human capital during child-related career breaks, the gaps associated with one child are predominantly driven by mothers' choice of jobs and occupations that pay less. The residual gap is smallest in Nordic countries, where public policies actively support gender equality and reconciliation of work and family, as well as Belgium and France, and largest in the post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Anglo-Saxon countries.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.