The value of G-CSF in women experienced at least one implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Published
May 02, 2024
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
PICOID
074e07a1
DOI
Citations
0
Keywords
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, implantation failure, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, pregnancy outcome
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 Su, Pan, Yin and Li.
Patients/Population/Participants

women with at least one implantation failure

Intervention

G-CSF administration

Comparison

no G-CSF administration

Outcome

clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), live birth rate (LBR)

Abstract

P
I
C
O

Despite the developments of We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of G-CSF on implantation failure up to July 21, 2023. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and the heterogeneity of the studies with the I We identified a total of 2031 studies and finally included 10 studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis. G-CSF administration improved the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), and live birth rate (LBR) in women with at least one implantation failure. Subgroup analyses showed that G-CSF treatment could exert good advantages in improving CPR [OR=2.49, 95%CI (1.56, 3.98), I G-CSF has a beneficial effect on pregnancy outcomes to some extent among women who experienced at least one implantation failure, and the administration dosage and timing influence the effect size.

Similar article map

CEO: Hwi-yeol YunCOO: Jung-woo ChaeCTO: Sangkeun Jung
Location: 204, W6, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Tel: 042-821-7328E-mail: webmaster@lilac-co.kr
Copyright © 2024 by LiLac. All Rights Reserved.